Pages

Saturday, January 26, 2013


 
When explaining a book to someone that hasn’t read it, one would comprise a summary of the book.  The summary consists of an overview of the book, giving enough information to inform the person of a brief description of the story, but not too much information so the person cannot predict what is going to happen.

An example of a summary is from the book “All The Pretty Horses”, by Cormac McCarthy.  “McCarthy’s landscape is the southwest of Texas and Mexico between the two wars, a time of uneasy transition, when horses and motor vehicles share the road and cattle ranches and cowboys are fading from the landscape.  John Grady Cole, a 16-year-old with a love for horses and a knowledge of them far beyond his years, senses on some level that the way of life he loves—horses and cattle ranching—is soon to come to an end.  He and his best friend Lacey Rawlins run away to Mexico in search of unnamed fulfillment other than the promise of adventure.  Their meeting with the enigmatic Jimmy Blevins is a pivotal event that leads Cole into a series of bittersweet and violent encounters in a land where the rules are unknown and constantly changing.  When Cole and Rawlins separate from Blevins and obtain employment on a Mexican cattle ranch, it appears that they have achieved their idyllic dream.  Their brief association with Blevins, however, collides with Cole’s affair with Alejandra, the beautiful and willful daughter of the owner of the ranch.  Cole and Blevins soon find themselves in a situation where neither hope nor mercy exist.”

While the above summary explains what the story is about, it doesn’t give too much detailed information, leaving the reader wanting to find out more.  The reader will want to read the story, being intrigued by the summary.

On the other hand, if one were to analyze this story, there would be no plot, no description of the story, and no story line.  Instead, by giving an analysis of this book, one would dissect portions of what the author is trying to say by examining the details and structure of the writing.  An example of an analysis of All the Pretty Horses, I would state McCarthy shows a time of transition between two different worlds or cultures, American and Mexican, and how the two different worlds collide with their differences in criminal punishment.  McCarthy portrays the Mexican judicial system as a harsh, discriminatory system, where a person’s life is literally at the mercy of this judicial system and the life of the punished lay in someone else’s hands.
Although there are similarities between summary and analysis, since the analysis does have to have some description to get the point you are trying to make about the book across, the two are extremely different, with two totally different types of explanations.

http://www.bookreporter.com/reviews/all-the-pretty-horses

http://www.picador.com/books/All-the-Pretty-Horses

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Good Readers and Good Writers

Nabokov feels a good reader is a re-reader, one who looks deep into the story.  As Nabokov states, "But a second, or third, or fourth reading we do, in a sense, behave towards a book as we do towards a painting.", which is how we look at a painting, over and over again, always finding something different with each look.  I agree with Nabokov, reading a book only once myself usually, I will glance over the words and get basically what the author is saying, but not the whole story.  I have learned from different teachers that to thoroughly enjoy a story, you have to "dissect" what the author writes, creating more of a deep, vibrant picture in your mind as well as a better understanding of what message the author is trying to get across to the reader.

I feel the characteristics of a good reader is one who will re-read a book, getting the most information out of it possible.  A good reader also would have a vivid imagination, isn't afraid of picking up a dictionary to look up words not understood, and one who tries to get as much out of that book, even obscure messages sent by the author through a story, possibly even a lesson learned.  My reading capabilities usually consist of getting through a story as quickly as possible, skimming across the pages and getting only the basic story from the author.  Unless the story is something I am interested in, I feel I am not the "re-reader" Nabokov explains as a good reader.



books-clipart

"But a second, or third, or fourth reading we do,
in a sense, behave towards a book as we do towards a painting."
 
I have attached the link to the reading from Nabokov below: